By utalley on December 5th, 2011

2012: The Year for Information Governance
According to an article by Mark Brunelli, Senior News Editor with SearchDataManagement.com, a growing number of organizations are realizing that data governance is more important than ever and will take center stage in 2012. Based on a SearchDataManagement.com 2011 Reader survey, 77% of respondents either have, or are planning to implement, a data governance program – a 9% increase over last year.
In the article, Brunelli interviews Sunil Soares, director of information governance with IBM’s software group. According to Soares, “It’s [information governance] a trend that shows no signs of slowing as 2012 approaches. The increase in awareness can be attributed to business users who are at last taking ownership of data. In other words, organizations have realized that data problems are business problems.”
Similarly, according to the 2011 eDiscoveryJournal and ViaLumina Information Governance Survey, most people view information governance as an umbrella for multiple disciplines including eDiscovery, records management, security, compliance, storage and archiving, risk management, and privacy. The majority of survey respondents revealed that they are investigating Information Governance and actively working to determine how to apply it to their organizations.
As 2012 looms near, new regulatory mandates such as FINRA 4511 and 4512, and the Dodd-Frank Act put a renewed focus on the need for information governance solutions. Fred Pulzello and Sonali Bhavsar wrote in an article for Information Management magazine, “Companies that proactively invest in establishing information governance policies, procedures, and technology will improve the efficiency of their compliance programs and will be in the best shape to adapt quickly to the new rules and regulations and manage the risks associated with doing business in this environment.”
StoredIQ provides actionable information governance solutions, enabling organizations to gain visibility and control over business-critical information to meet their eDiscovery, records management, compliance, and storage management requirements. With StoredIQ, legal, records managers, compliance officers, or IT can utilize a suite of purpose-built applications that arm them with the information intelligence needed to minimize the cost and risk of governing the ever increasing amount of unstructured data stored across the enterprise.
As 2012 approaches we’d like to know, what are some of the biggest information governance challenges your organization faces? eDiscovery, Storage Optimization, Compliance, Records Management? With StoredIQ, information governance doesn’t have to be a boil the ocean approach; ROI can be attained through existing IT and compliance initiatives, or trigger events like eDiscovery or regulatory response. So as you plan your 2012 information governance initiatives, there is great value in knowing what data you have and where, whether the efforts are reactive or proactive or apply to legacy data or new policies. Use of technology like StoredIQ is critical to informing, improving, and maintaining adequate data governance.
According to an article by Mark Brunelli, Senior News Editor with SearchDataManagement.com, a growing number of organizations are realizing that data governance is more important than ever and will take center stage in 2012. Based on a SearchDataManagement.com 2011 Reader survey, 77% of respondents either have, or are planning to implement, a data governance program – a 9% increase over last year.
In the article, Brunelli interviews Sunil Soares, director of information governance with IBM’s software group. According to Soares, “It’s [information governance] a trend that shows no signs of slowing as 2012 approaches. The increase in awareness can be attributed to business users who are at last taking ownership of data. In other words, organizations have realized that data problems are business problems.”
Similarly, according to the 2011 eDiscoveryJournal and ViaLumina Information Governance Survey, most people view information governance as an umbrella for multiple disciplines including eDiscovery, records management, security, compliance, storage and archiving, risk management, and privacy. The majority of survey respondents revealed that they are investigating Information Governance and actively working to determine how to apply it to their organizations.
As 2012 looms near, new regulatory mandates such as FINRA 4511 and 4512, and the Dodd-Frank Act put a renewed focus on the need for information governance solutions. Fred Pulzello and Sonali Bhavsar wrote in an article for Information Management magazine, “Companies that proactively invest in establishing information governance policies, procedures, and technology will improve the efficiency of their compliance programs and will be in the best shape to adapt quickly to the new rules and regulations and manage the risks associated with doing business in this environment.”
StoredIQ provides actionable information governance solutions, enabling organizations to gain visibility and control over business-critical information to meet their eDiscovery, records management, compliance, and storage management requirements. With StoredIQ, legal, records managers, compliance officers, or IT can utilize a suite of purpose-built applications that arm them with the information intelligence needed to minimize the cost and risk of governing the ever increasing amount of unstructured data stored across the enterprise.

As 2012 approaches we’d like to know, what are some of the biggest information governance challenges your organization faces? eDiscovery, Storage Optimization, Compliance, Records Management? With StoredIQ, information governance doesn’t have to be a boil the ocean approach; ROI can be attained through existing IT and compliance initiatives, or trigger events like eDiscovery or regulatory response. So as you plan your 2012 information governance initiatives, there is great value in knowing what data you have and where it resides, whether the efforts are reactive or proactive, or apply to legacy data or new policies. Use of information intelligence technology like StoredIQ is critical to informing, improving, and maintaining adequate data governance.
TOPICS: information governance, information management
By admin on November 21st, 2011
In honor of the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday, we – at StoredIQ – have put together the 3rd annual list of the Top 10 Things To Be Thankful for in Information Governance.

- I’m thankful that my Information Governance technology can orchestrate all my ESI better than a professional chef can orchestrate a gourmet Thanksgiving feast.
- I’m thankful that the eDiscovery for this court case didn’t cost me an arm and a (turkey) leg.
- I’m thankful that my eDiscovery solution helps me settle legal arguments quicker than I can settle family disputes at the dinner table.
- I’m thankful for “fat pants” after eating a Thanksgiving dinner that makes Big Data look small.
- I’m thankful that it’s easier to organize my electronic information than it is to organize who’s bringing which dish to Thanksgiving dinner.
- I’m thankful that mapping my data is easier than teaching Great Aunt Thelma to use a Garmin to map her way to my house for Thanksgiving dinner.
- I’m thankful that unlike football, my eDiscovery solution makes holding legal.
- I’m thankful that I have an Information Governance solution sophisticated enough to let me find all my data—just like finding one person in the midst of the Macy’s Day Parade.
- I’m thankful that I know the difference between spoliation of evidence, and spoiled leftovers.
- I’m thankful that finding my ESI isn’t as hard as finding cranberry sauce at the grocery store on Thanksgiving morning.
Happy Thanksgiving from StoredIQ!
In honor of the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday, we – at StoredIQ – thought it would be fun to put together a list of the Top 10 Things To Be Thankful for in eDiscovery.
I’m thankful that instead of being in a Meet and Confer this Thanksgiving, I get to meet up with all my distant relatives (hmm…then again maybe not).
I’m thankful that the eDiscovery for this court case didn’t cost me an arm and a (turkey) leg.
I’m thankful that my eDiscovery solution helps me settle legal arguments quicker than I can settle family disputes at the dinner table.
I’m thankful for “fat pants” after eating a Thanksgiving dinner that makes Big Data look small.
I’m thankful for real eDiscovery tools, and not just marketing tofurkey.
I’m thankful that mapping my data is easier than teaching Great Aunt Thelma to use a Garmin to map her way to my house for Thanksgiving dinner.
I’m thankful that unlike football, my eDiscovery solution makes holding legal.
I’m thankful that it will be the tryptophan from the turkey that will make me fall asleep on Thanksgiving and not reading through my ESI.
I’m thankful that I know the difference between spoliation of evidence, and spoiled leftovers.
I’m thankful that finding my ESI isn’t as hard as finding cranberry sauce at the grocery store on Thanksgiving morning.
TOPICS: eDiscovery, information governance
By utalley on November 17th, 2011
I recently read an article in LTN covering the Guidance product announcement – “Guidance Adds Data Re-use Feature to EnCase eDiscovery”. We applaud their addition of this feature since at StoredIQ we’ve had this capability for many years and believe it is a fundamental component for conducting thorough, legally sound collections. Our term for ‘Data Re-use’ is ‘Incremental, Single-Instance Collection’. What does this mean? In instances where the same files are relevant for multiple cases, StoredIQ will copy and place on legal hold only a single instance of that file. If that file is required for multiple matters, each matter will utilize that single copy, saving storage space as well as the time and bandwidth required to collect the data. And, with incremental collections, only files that are new or have been modified since the last collection will be collected for preservation, further streamlining the collection process. Only when all matters for a given file are concluded, and the obligation for legal hold is removed, will the file be available for disposition from the repository.
Possibly because StoredIQ has had this capability for quite some time, we’ve taken for granted that this is a standard feature of any good eDiscovery technology that has a collections component. The LTN article raised our awareness that this is something we should talk about more.
Maybe more newsworthy than the addition of this feature is the fact that Guidance has not had this capability until now. It should make their customers wonder how many case collections have been jeopardized by not having the capability to search the preservation location from previous and simultaneous, on-going cases.
I recently read an article in LTN, authored by Evan Kobletz, covering the Guidance product announcement – “Guidance Adds Data Re-use Feature to EnCase eDiscovery”. After some discussion at StoredIQ, we’re actually pretty excited about the coverage. It sheds light on capability that we’ve had for years now, and probably don’t talk enough about. In fact, the article also highlights several competitors that still don’t have it. The StoredIQ term for ‘Data Re-use’ is ‘Incremental, Single-Instance Collection’, but setting aside semantics, we believe it’s a fundamental component for conducting thorough, legally sound eDiscovery collections.
What does this mean to eDiscovery customers? The first time a file is relevant to a case, we’ll take a forensically sound copy and place it on a retention server for preservation with a litigation hold tag specific to the given matter, without altering the metadata and without interrupting end users. If it’s an ongoing case, we’ll perform incremental collections – meaning that we’ll only get another copy if that file has been changed (or if other new relevant files are created). When another case crops up, and the same file is once again relevant, StoredIQ is aware that the file is already on retention and instead of taking the time, bandwidth and storage space to collect another copy StoredIQ just places an additional hold tag on the file. If your company is in a highly litigious industry or has a number of serial litigants, you can imagine the savings this can add up to over time. Only when all matters for a given file are concluded, and the obligation for legal hold is removed, will the file be available for disposition from the repository.
Possibly because StoredIQ has had this capability for quite some time, we’ve taken for granted that incremental, single-instance collection is a standard feature of any intelligent eDiscovery technology that has a collections component. And more importantly, a feature that eDiscovery customers should consider closely. Note that the article also mentions that this feature also enables users to “search collection sets from previous litigation”. That statement alone makes me wonder how many case collections have been jeopardized by not having the capability to search and produce data from the preservation location used by previous and simultaneous, on-going cases?
On a broader scale, in the LTN article, Kobletz, states, “Data reuse is a growing trend in the e-discovery industry.” We at StoredIQ actually see ‘data reuse’, to use the same term, as a trend that goes well beyond eDiscovery. The same data that your legal team needs to identify and collect for a legal matter, is also the same data that your records management team needs to classify, your IT team needs to store and manage, and your compliance officers need to govern. At the end of the day, your corporate data is all being ‘re-used’ by multiple departments – not just the legal team for multiple matters.
What companies need is the ability to identify, classify, manage, and act on their data assets – to provide value across the entire organization. That’s something you won’t get from Guidance, or any point solution eDiscovery product. At StoredIQ, we’re focused on delivering powerful information governance products that can provide the comprehensive data insight and control that corporate counsel, compliance managers, and records managers need to make the best and most informed decisions, while meeting the stringent requirements that IT departments demand.
TOPICS: eDiscovery, information governance, information intelligence, information management
Recent Comments